Breast Cancer Risk Genes — Association Analysis in More than 113,000 Women

663Citations
Citations of this article
924Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility is widely used, but for many genes, evidence of an association with breast cancer is weak, underlying risk estimates are imprecise, and reliable subtype-specific risk estimates are lacking. METHODS We used a panel of 34 putative susceptibility genes to perform sequencing on samples from 60,466 women with breast cancer and 53,461 controls. In separate analyses for protein-truncating variants and rare missense variants in these genes, we estimated odds ratios for breast cancer overall and tumor subtypes. We evaluated missense-variant associations according to domain and classification of pathogenicity. RESULTS Protein-truncating variants in 5 genes (ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2) were associated with a risk of breast cancer overall with a P value of less than 0.0001. Protein-truncating variants in 4 other genes (BARD1, RAD51C, RAD51D, and TP53) were associated with a risk of breast cancer overall with a P value of less than 0.05 and a Bayesian false-discovery probability of less than 0.05. For protein-truncating variants in 19 of the remaining 25 genes, the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the odds ratio for breast cancer overall was less than 2.0. For protein-truncating variants in ATM and CHEK2, odds ratios were higher for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease than for ER-negative disease; for protein-truncating variants in BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D, odds ratios were higher for ER-negative disease than for ER-positive disease. Rare missense variants (in aggregate) in ATM, CHEK2, and TP53 were associated with a risk of breast cancer overall with a P value of less than 0.001. For BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53, missense variants (in aggregate) that would be classified as pathogenic according to standard criteria were associated with a risk of breast cancer overall, with the risk being similar to that of protein-truncating variants. CONCLUSIONS The results of this study define the genes that are most clinically useful for inclusion on panels for the prediction of breast cancer risk, as well as provide estimates of the risks associated with protein-truncating variants, to guide genetic counseling. (Funded by European Union Horizon 2020 programs and others.).

References Powered by Scopus

Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: A combined analysis of 22 studies

3043Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Risks of breast, ovarian, and contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

2046Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Gene-panel sequencing and the prediction of breast-cancer risk

739Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Adjuvant olaparib for patients with BRCA1- Or BRCA2-mutated breast cancer

1039Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021

523Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ACMG SF v3.1 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

169Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

(2021). Breast Cancer Risk Genes — Association Analysis in More than 113,000 Women. New England Journal of Medicine, 384(5), 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1913948

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25085170255340

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 211

55%

Researcher 115

30%

Professor / Associate Prof. 41

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 14

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 197

49%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 142

36%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40

10%

Nursing and Health Professions 20

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 6
News Mentions: 25
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 118

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0