Nursing workload and patient-focused outcomes in intensive care: A systematic review

10Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to examine the association of nursing workload on patient outcomes in intensive care units. The primary outcome measure was patient mortality, with adverse events (AE), the secondary outcome measures. Electronic search of databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMCARE, Scopus, and Web of Science were performed. Studies were excluded if they were in non-ICU settings, pediatric, neonatal populations, or if the abstract/full text was unavailable. Risk of bias was assessed by the ROBINS-I tool. After screening 4129 articles, 32 studies were identified as meeting inclusion criteria. The majority of included studies were assessed as having a moderate risk of bias. The nursing activities score (NAS) was the most frequently used tool to assess nursing workload. Our systematic review identified that higher nursing workload was associated with patient-focused outcomes, including increased mortality and AE in the intensive care setting. The varied approaches of measuring and reporting nursing workload make it difficult to translate the findings of the impact of nursing workload on patient outcomes in intensive care settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ross, P., Howard, B., Ilic, D., Watterson, J., & Hodgson, C. L. (2023, December 1). Nursing workload and patient-focused outcomes in intensive care: A systematic review. Nursing and Health Sciences. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.13052

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free