Comorbidity in trichotillomania (hair-pulling disorder): A cluster analytical approach

24Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: A promising approach to reducing the phenotypic heterogeneity of psychiatric disorders involves the identification of homogeneous subtypes. Careful study of comorbidity in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) contributed to the identification of the DSM-5 subtype of OCD with tics. Here we investigated one of the largest available cohorts of clinically diagnosed trichotillomania (TTM) to determine whether subtyping TTM based on comorbidity would help delineate clinically meaningful subgroups. Methods: As part of an ongoing international collaboration, lifetime comorbidity data were collated from 304 adults with pathological hair-pulling who fulfilled criteria for DSM-IV-TR or DSM-5 TTM. Cluster analysis (Ward's method) based on comorbidities was undertaken. Results: Three clusters were identified, namely Cluster 1: cases without any comorbidities (n = 63, 20.7%) labeled “simple TTM,” Cluster 2: cases with comorbid major depressive disorder only (N = 49, 16.12%) labeled “depressive TTM,” and Cluster 3: cases presenting with combinations of the investigated comorbidities (N = 192, 63.16%) labeled “complex TTM.” The clusters differed in terms of hair-pulling severity (F = 3.75, p =.02; Kruskal–Wallis [KW] p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lochner, C., Keuthen, N. J., Curley, E. E., Tung, E. S., Redden, S. A., Ricketts, E. J., … Stein, D. J. (2019). Comorbidity in trichotillomania (hair-pulling disorder): A cluster analytical approach. Brain and Behavior, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1456

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free