Bone density of the calcaneus and fractures in 75- and 80-year-old men and women

33Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

bone mineral density of the calcaneus in relation to fractures was studied both retrospectively and prospectively among the 75- and 80-year-old men and women resident in the city of Jyväskylä, Finland, in 1989 and 1990, respectively. The bone measurements were performed at the calcaneus by125I-photon absorption. Retrospective fracture (RF) history after age 50 was collected by questionnaire and interview, and reported fractures were checked from medical records. In the retrospective study, in the 75-year-olds a fracture was found in 22% (n=22) of men and in 45% (n=84) of women. The corresponding figures for the 80-year-olds were 16% (n=9) and 35% (n=48). Over half of the fractures were of the wrist/hand or ankle/leg. Prospective fractures (PF) were recorded over periods of 29–34 months. Twenty of the 75-year-olds and 16 of the 80-year-olds sustained a fracture during the follow-up period. In the 75-year-olds, the results showed that both RF and PF women, together with the RF men, had lower bone area density (BMDa) and volume density (BMDv) than the non-fracture (NF) subjects (p=0.001–0.011). In the 80-year-olds, significantly lower BMDa was found in the RF women (p=0.008) and lower BMDv in the PF women (p=0.024) compared with the NF subjects. During the follow-up period there were no fractures in either of the sex or age groups among those with BMDa and BMDv values greater than 1 SD above the mean. When using logistic regression analysis, BMDv alone explained about 60% of overall fracture probability among the women studied. © 1994, European Foundation for Osteoporosis. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheng, S., Suominen, H., Era, P., & Heikkinen, E. (1994). Bone density of the calcaneus and fractures in 75- and 80-year-old men and women. Osteoporosis International: With Other Metabolic Bone Diseases, 4(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02352261

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free