Dopamine precursor depletion improves punishment prediction during reversal learning in healthy females but not males

40Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: The neurotransmitter dopamine has frequently been implicated in reward processing but is also, increasingly, implicated in punishment processing. We have previously shown that both patients with Parkinson's disease and healthy individuals with low dopamine (DA) synthesis are better at reversal learning based on punishment than reward. Here, we extend these prior findings by examining the effects of artificially reducing DA synthesis in healthy individuals performing this previously employed task. Methods: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design, we applied the acute tyrosine and phenylalanine depletion (ATPD) procedure to reduce global DA synthesis in 15 female and 14 male subjects. Each subject performed the reward- and punishment-based reversal-learning paradigm. Results: There was a significant three-way interaction between ATPD, the valence of the outcome signalling reversal and the gender of the participants. Examination of punishment and reward-based reversals separately revealed that this was driven by a significant improvement in punishment processing in female but not male subjects following DA depletion. Conclusions: Reducing DA synthesis in healthy individuals shifted sensitivity of performance from reward to punishment processing. Gender differences in DA synthesis might underlie the selectivity of this effect to female subjects. Such gender biases may go some way towards explaining the gender biases in certain psychiatric disorders such as depression and Parkinson's disease. © 2010 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robinson, O. J., Standing, H. R., Devito, E. E., Cools, R., & Sahakian, B. J. (2010). Dopamine precursor depletion improves punishment prediction during reversal learning in healthy females but not males. Psychopharmacology, 211(2), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-010-1880-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free