A comparative study on support vector machine and constructive RBF neural network for prediction of success of dental implants

4Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The market demand for dental implants is growing at a significant pace. In practice, some dental implants do not succeed. Important questions in this regard concern whether machine learning techniques could be used to predict if an implant will be successful and which are the best techniques for this problem. This paper presents a comparative study on three machine learning techniques for prediction of success of dental implants. The techniques compared here are: (a) support vector machines (SVM); (b) weighted support vector machines; and (c) constructive RBF neural networks (RBF-DDA) with parameter selection. We present a number of simulations using real-world data. The simulations were carried out using 10-fold cross-validation and the results show that the methods achieve comparable performance, yet RBF-DDA had the advantage of building smaller classifiers. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Oliveira, A. L. I., Baldisserotto, C., & Baldisserotto, J. (2005). A comparative study on support vector machine and constructive RBF neural network for prediction of success of dental implants. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3773 LNCS, pp. 1015–1026). https://doi.org/10.1007/11578079_104

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free