Effectiveness of health education materials in general practice waiting rooms: A cross-sectional study

17Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background Health education materials (HEMs) are widely used in general practice. However, there is little information on the variety of HEMs currently available to patients in the UK, or their preferences for accessing educational materials. Aim To assess patients' perceptions of HEMs, and the variety and accessibility of these materials. Design and setting Cross-sectional study conducted in general practices in Brighton and Hove. Method An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to patients in the waiting room (WR). Additionally, an audit was conducted to measure the variety of the HEMs. Results were analysed using binary multiple logistic regression. Results In all, 556 participants (response rate 83.1%) from 19 practices took part. The mean age of participants was 49.3 years (SD ±18.9) and 63% were female. Perceived usefulness of HEMs was associated with reading in the WR using written HEMs, and not having a university degree; noticeability was associated with reading in the WR, and being female; attractiveness was associated with not having a university degree and shorter waiting time. On average, WRs contained 72 posters covering 23 topics, and 53 leaflets covering 24 topics, with many outdated and poorly presented materials of limited accessibility. Conclusion This study found substantial variation in the amount, topicality, and quality of material available in WRs. As most patients notice HEMs and find them useful, available technology could be better utilised to widen access to HEMs. The introduction of wireless free internet (Wi-Fi) to waiting rooms should provide an opportunity to update this area.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maskell, K., Paudyal, P., & McDonald, P. (2018). Effectiveness of health education materials in general practice waiting rooms: A cross-sectional study. British Journal of General Practice, 68(677), E869–E876. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X699773

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free