The improved success rate and reduced complications of a novel localization device vs. hookwire for thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules: a single-center, open-label, randomized clinical trial

4Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: In our previous study, we developed a 4-hook claw-suture localization device for pulmonary nodule resection, which acheived satifisfactory results. Following this, we conducted this single-center, open-label, randomized clinical trial to compare the success rate and complication rate of this novel localization device and currently widely-used hookwire. Methods: Patients with small pulmonary nodules (0.4-1 cm) who received preoperative localization and thoracoscopic resection at Shanghai Chest Hospital were randomly assigned (1:2 ratio, via computer-generated randomized numbers) to undergo localization using either a novel claw-suture system (claw group) or classical (hookwire group) localization device. The primary endpoint of this study was localization success rate, and the secondary endpoints included complications, localization-related time, and pain. Results: A total of 411 patients were randomly assigned to the claw group (n=136) or the hookwire group (n=275) before thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules and analyzed. Compared with the hookwire group, the claw group had a significantly higher success rate (133/136, 97.8% vs. 254/275, 92.4%, P=0.027), less asymptomatic hemorrhage (16.9% vs. 37.5%, P=0.003) and pleural reaction (0% vs. 5.1%, P=0.017), as well as better pain alleviation 10 min after localization (measured using the difference between two visual analog scale scores, 0.84±0.98 vs. 0.35±0.79, P<0.001). In contrast, the hookwire group was associated with a shorter localization procedure duration than the claw group (7.2±2.9 vs. 14.4±6.6min, P<0.001). In the multiple localization subgroup, the claw group compared to the hookwire group also achieved higher success (32/33, 97.0% vs. 70/86, 81.4%) and less pleural reaction (0% vs. 16.3%). Conclusions: The new claw-suture localization device is superior to traditional hookwire, with a higher success rate, fewer complications, and better patient tolerance for preoperative localization of small pulmonary nodules.

References Powered by Scopus

CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

6620Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP)

3678Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for small indeterminate pulmonary nodules: Indications for preoperative marking

398Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fan, L., Ma, W., Ma, J., Yang, L., Wang, Z., Xu, K., … Yao, F. (2022). The improved success rate and reduced complications of a novel localization device vs. hookwire for thoracoscopic resection of small pulmonary nodules: a single-center, open-label, randomized clinical trial. Translational Lung Cancer Research, 11(8), 1702–1712. https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-22-555

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

67%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free