Towards non-physical realism

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to show that a dualist model is not only possible but also most appropriate in order to understand the problem of consciousness and the existence of Free Will. By “dualist” we refer to the assumption that reality cannot be explained exclusively by observable causes in space-time. The dualist view we speak about here does not totally correspond to the classical conception of “dualism,” according to which matter and consciousness would be two radically separate things. The first part of this paper is dedicated to EPR-type experiments which show that no matter what the interpretations are, we are obliged to call into question the classical notions of time and space and obliged to accept that ultimate reality cannot be localized in or be dependent on time and space. In the second part I will be arguing that in order to be understood the experiments of Benjamin Libet must be studied in a dualist framework, even though Libet was not himself a dualist. A Copernican revolution is therefore possible not only in our understanding of the world but also in our comprehension of the nature of consciousness.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Staune, J. (2013). Towards non-physical realism. In Is Science Compatible with Free Will?: Exploring Free Will and Consciousness in the Light of Quantum Physics and Neuroscience (pp. 209–224). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5212-6_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free