Cost comparison of full-scale water reclamation technologies with an emphasis on membrane bioreactors

66Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper assesses the costs of full-scale membrane bioreactors (MBRs). Capital expenditures (CAPEX) and operating expenses (OPEX) of Spanish MBR facilities have been verified and compared to activated sludge plants (CAS) using water reclamation treatment (both conventional and advanced). Spanish MBR facilities require a production of 0.6 to 1.2 kWh perm3, while extended aeration (EA) and advanced reclamation treatment require 1.2 kWh per m3. The energy represents around 40% of the OPEX in MBRs. In terms of CAPEX, the implementation costs of a CAS facility followed by conventional water reclamation treatment (physical-chemical sand filtration disinfection) ranged from 730 to 850 .m3d, and from 1,050 to 1,250 .m3d in the case of advanced reclamation treatment facilities (membrane filtration) with a capacity of 8,000 to 15,000 m3d1. The MBR cost for similar capacities ranges between 700 and 960 .m3d. This study shows that MBRs that have been recently installed represent a cost competitive option for water reuse applications for medium and large capacities (over 10,000 m3d1), with similar OPEX to EA and conventional water reclamation treatment. In terms of CAPEX, MBRs are cheaper than EA, followed by advanced water reclamation treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iglesias, R., Simón, P., Moragas, L., Arce, A., & Rodriguez-Roda, I. (2017). Cost comparison of full-scale water reclamation technologies with an emphasis on membrane bioreactors. Water Science and Technology, 75(11), 2562–2570. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.132

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free