Mundane Governance: Ontology and Accountability

  • Marlin A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
92Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This chapter begins by describing a ferment of mundane governance, investigating routines, processes, and outcomes of ordinary activities newly opened to moral reclassification, everyday objects, and people that are being reclassified, the focus of indignation, and target of legal action. It draws on a wide range of studies to help make sense of it all: accountability, governmentality, materiality, ontological multiplicity, evidence, space, ordinary and everyday objects, science and technology. Yet delving into these literatures raises more questions than answers. What exactly are accountability relations? How are the ontologies of governance constituted? How do entities, objects, and things become of the world? Is it better to think that people and things are governed in spaces or that spaces are themselves governed into being? What is the import of noticing how objects are constitutively linked with their people? Through what processes are things and people and continuously reclassified

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marlin, A. (2014). Mundane Governance: Ontology and Accountability. Science & Technology Studies, 27(3), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55318

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free