Red and processed meat and pancreatic cancer risk: a meta-analysis

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The relationship between red and processed meat consumption and pancreatic cancer risk is controversial and no study has looked specifically at the correlation for 6 years. We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the evidence about the association between them. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library for studies of red or processed meat consumption and pancreatic cancer published from December 2016 to July 2022. We performed random-effects models to pool the relative risks from individual studies. Subgroup analyses were used to figure out heterogeneity. We also performed publication bias analysis. Results: Seven cohort studies and one case–control study that contained a total of 7,158 pancreatic cancer cases from 805,177 participants were eligible for inclusion. The combined RRs (95% CI) comparing highest and lowest categories were 1.07 (95% CI: 0.91–1.26; p = 0.064) for red meat and 1.04 (95% CI: 0.81–1.33; p = 0.006) for processed meat with statistically significant heterogeneity. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggested that red and processed meat consumption has no relationship with pancreatic cancer risk.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sun, Y., He, X., & Sun, Y. (2023). Red and processed meat and pancreatic cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Nutrition. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2023.1249407

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free