Correction: Risk of bias and confounding of observational studies of Zika virus infection: A scoping review of research protocols (PLoS ONE (2017) 12:7 (e0180220) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180220)

0Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Copyright statement appears incorrectly. The correct statement is: © 2017 Pan American Health Organization; licensee “PLOS ONE”. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that PAHO or this article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the PAHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article’s original URL. The following information is missing from the Competing Interests section: The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the decisions, policies, or views of the WHO or PAHO.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reveiz, L., Haby, M. M., Martínez-Vega, R., Pinzón-Flores, C. E., Elias, V., Smith, E., … Van Kerkhove, M. D. (2017, November 1). Correction: Risk of bias and confounding of observational studies of Zika virus infection: A scoping review of research protocols (PLoS ONE (2017) 12:7 (e0180220) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180220). PLoS ONE. Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free