Relation classification: CNN or RNN?

19Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNN) have delivered competitive performance on relation classification, without tedious feature engineering. A particular shortcoming of CNN, however, is that it is less powerful in modeling long-span relations. This paper presents a model based on recurrent neural networks (RNN) and compares the capabilities of CNN and RNN on the relation classification task. We conducted a thorough comparative study on two databases: one is the popular SemEval-2010 Task 8 dataset, and the other is the KBP37 dataset we designed based on MIML-RE [1], with the goal of learning and testing complex relations. The experimental results strongly indicate that even with a simple RNN structure, the model can deliver much better performance than CNN, particularly for long-span relations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, D., & Wang, D. (2016). Relation classification: CNN or RNN? In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10102, pp. 665–675). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50496-4_60

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free