We live in a time of multiple neuro-ontologies where one academic discipline after the other adds on the prefix ‘neuro-’ to emphasize a new awareness of the significance of neuroscientific findings to their specific field of study: neuro-economics, neuro-marketing, neuro-architecture, neuro-psychology, neuro-education, and on and on (Rose and Abi-Rached, 2013; Satel and Lilienfield, 2013). A growing number of politicians and policymakers urge educators to take an interest in the advances of the neurosciences for it to apply to practice. Moreover, for over a decade researchers in the emerging discipline of educational neurosciences have aimed to create a new transdisciplinary field of research, where knowledge from the neurosciences and education can be integrated (Battro et al., 2011; Fischer et al., 2007; Samuels, 2009).
CITATION STYLE
Taguchi, H. L. (2016). Deleuzo-Guattarian Rhizomatics: Mapping the Desiring Forces and Connections between Educational Practices and the Neurosciences. In Posthuman Research Practices in Education (pp. 37–57). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453082_4
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.