Collision Prediction in an Integrated Framework of Scenario-Based and Data-Driven Approaches

2Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A collision prediction framework integrating scenario-based approach with data-driven approach is proposed to enhance the safety of autonomous driving vehicles as well as advanced driver assistance systems. No matter how the autonomous driving is intelligent, it is inevitable to consider malfunction or faults of sensors, actuators, and processors, thus resulting in the collision. To address these issues, several studies have been proposed to improve performance based on model-based or data-driven approaches. However, there are several challenges in terms of the scarcity of accident data and the lack of explainability of deep neural networks. To overcome the limits of both approaches, an integrated framework that includes trajectory prediction, threat assessment, and decision-making based on convolutional neural network (CNN) for collision prediction is introduced. For more detail, both trajectory prediction based on Kalman filter and probabilistic threat metric are added in the form of a simplified bird's eye view (SBEV), which is the input to the network. In the development of the proposed algorithm, pre-crash simulation data and experimental data have been employed. A comparative study shows that the proposed algorithm outperforms the model-based algorithm on simulation data containing safety-critical scenarios. Furthermore, it outperforms the data-driven algorithm on experimental data.

References Powered by Scopus

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, S., Song, B., & Shin, J. (2024). Collision Prediction in an Integrated Framework of Scenario-Based and Data-Driven Approaches. IEEE Access, 12, 55234–55247. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3388099

Readers over time

‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 25

93%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 20

91%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0