Confirmation of a portion of the Sibley-Ahlquist "tapestry"

16Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

DNA-DNA hybridization was used to compare seven taxa from five avian orders, with an alligator as outgroup. Complete matrices of ΔT 50H and ΔNPH (both symmetrized and unsymmetrized) gave the same FITCH topology, which was supported in 100% of bootstrapped and jackknifed trees. The outgroup alligator rooted the tree between anseriform-galliform and coliiform-strigiform-columbiform clades, and resolution within the latter favored a strigiform-columbiform association. In contrast, ΔTm gave differing and more poorly supported FITCH resolutions for deeper nodes because the distances were compressed due to greatly reduced NPHs. An F-ratio test between FITCH and KITSCH trees based on symmetrized Jukes-Cantor-corrected ΔT50Hs indicated significant rate variation among the lineages. Despite this result, the UPGMA algorithm applied to symmetrized data gave a topology identical to the ΔT50H and ANPH FITCH trees, whether or not the outgroup alligator was included. However, phenograms from unsymmetrized Δs of all three indices associated Bubo and Colius, as did the FITCH tree based on a completed matrix reconstructed from Sibley and Ahlquist's original data. Thus, our results support Sibley and Ahlquist's use of ΔT50H to assess ordinal patterns in avian phylogeny, replicate a portion of their "tapestry" based on the same DNA-DNA hybridization technique, and show that for these taxa least- squares and phenetic algorithms generate much the same topology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bleiweiss, R., Kirsch, J. A. W., & Shafi, N. (1995). Confirmation of a portion of the Sibley-Ahlquist “tapestry.” Auk, 112(1), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.2307/4088769

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free