Learning Analytics: Richer Perspectives Across Stakeholders

  • Knight S
  • Dawson S
  • Gašević D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This issue of the Journal of Learning Analytics features seven research papers, complemented by a practitioner research paper (Dvorak & Jia). Papers by McCoy and Shih, and Knight, Brozina, and Novoselich discuss the important topic of educators working with educational data, alongside (in the latter paper) student perspectives on learning analytics. Douglas, Bermel, Alam, and Madhavan; and Waddington, Nam, Lonn, and Teasley offer empirical insight on developing a richer perspective on learning material interaction and engagement in online learning contexts (MOOCs, and LMS’ respectively). Dvorak and Jia bring a practitioner perspective to the issue in their discussion of approaches to analyzing online work habits via timeliness, regularity, and intensity. Sutherland and White, and Vieira, Goldstein, Purzer, and Magana offer focus on specific subject-based learning activities (algebra learning, and student experimentation strategies in engineering design, respectively). Finally, Howley and Rosé discuss the complex interactions of theory and method in computational modeling of group learning processes. The issue also features a special section on learning analytics tutorials, edited by Gašević and Pechenizkiy. The editorial concludes with a report of the recent ‘hot spots section’ consultation from the editorial team of the journal.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Knight, S., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Jovanović, J., & Hershkovitz, A. (2016). Learning Analytics: Richer Perspectives Across Stakeholders. Journal of Learning Analytics, 3(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2016.33.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free