Effect of counseling on contraceptive uptake in Nigeria

  • Balogun O
  • Adewole A
  • Adeniran A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite multiple options for contraception, choices are limited with low satisfaction among clients in low resource countries. Effective counseling may improve satisfaction and compliance if adequately pursued. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of counseling on contraceptive choices and its associated factors. This was a prospective, descriptive study involving consenting family planning clients at the family planning clinic of a tertiary hospital in Ilorin, Nigeria. All participants completed an interviewer administered questionnaire designed for the study. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 21.0 (IBM, USA) and p value <0.05 was significant. Among the 260 participants, the mean age was 30.3±5.7 years, mean parity 3.0±1.0 and modal age 20–39years (93.5%). The commonest preferred contraceptive pre- and post-counseling was intrauterine device (36.5% vs. 53.5%); increased post-counseling desire was reported for injectables (28.8% vs. 35.4%) and implant (0% vs. 3.1%). Preferences increased post-counseling for highly effective methods (38.1% vs. 60.4%; p<0.0001), long term methods (38.1% vs. 60.4%; p<0.0001) and permanent methods (1.5% vs. 3.8%; p<0.001). Significant predictor of contraceptive choice precounseling was level of education (p=0.032) and parity (p<0.001) post-counseling. The study shows that counseling can improve choices, encourage satisfaction and possibly enhance compliance among contraceptive clients.Journal of Medical and Biomedical Sciences (2017) 6(3), 1 - 6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Balogun, O. R., Adewole, A., Adeniran, A. S., & Adegboye, R. (2018). Effect of counseling on contraceptive uptake in Nigeria. Journal of Medical and Biomedical Sciences, 6(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4314/jmbs.v6i3.1

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

65%

Researcher 4

24%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

12%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

58%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

25%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

8%

Social Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free