Localizing rights compliance: the case for cities as “shadow reporters” at international human rights treaty bodies

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

“Shadow reports” by nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) and national human rights institutions (NHRIs) are commonplace within the international human rights treaty monitoring process. They became so for a simple reason: shadow reports improve the reporting process by providing useful information. This article contends that shadow reports from cities would do the same. Using the example of reports sent by the City of Berkeley, California, this article advocates for institutionalizing city shadow reporting because such reports can provide frontline information and help socialize cities into human rights compliance, even (and perhaps especially) when at odds with their national government.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haddad, H. N., & Cui, I. (2021). Localizing rights compliance: the case for cities as “shadow reporters” at international human rights treaty bodies. Human Rights Quarterly, 43(3), 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2021.0037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free