Differences in substrate selectivities of the SPOUT superfamily of methyltransferases.

2Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Since the SPOUT superfamily was defined by homology between the SpoU and TrmD families [Anantharaman, V. et al., J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 4, 71-75 (2002)], many crystal structures have been solved and numerous new homologous sequences have been found in the superfamily. Therefore, nowadays, we can consider enzyme function and/or evolution process of the SPOUT superfamily members using not only amino acid sequences but also protein structures. Recently, a bioinformatics research on SPOUT superfamily proposed existences of new member proteins [COG1756, COG1772, COG4080, and COG1901], and provided a structural and evolutionary classification of the proteins [Tkaczuk, K.L. et al., BMC Bioinformatics, 8:73 (2007)], which serves as a guide for studies on the SPOUT family in future. In this meeting, we report a new approach using a flexible protein structure alignment algorithm (FATCAT) to analyze the structures of SPOUT superfamily proteins, and discuss differences in substrate selectivities of methyltransferases in the superfamily.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Toyooka, T., & Hori, H. (2007). Differences in substrate selectivities of the SPOUT superfamily of methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series (2004), (51), 445–446. https://doi.org/10.1093/nass/nrm223

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free