Aim: This study evaluated the mechanical behavior of implant-supported crowns obtained by different fabrication technique after thermomechanical cycling. Methods: Thirtytwo external hexagon dental implants were divided into four groups (n=10): CC - conventional casting with torch; EI - electromagnetic induction casting; PL - plasma casting; and CAD-CAM - milling through computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing. Vickers microhardness of the specimens were made before and after the thermomechanical cycling, and then subjected to fracture load. Fracture pattern was evaluated. Results: No significant difference was observed comparing the microhardness before and after thermomechanical cycling. CAD-CAM group presented significant lower microhardness than the other groups. No significant statistical difference was showed on fracture load between the groups. The CAD-CAM and PL presented lower number of failure by plastic deformation. Conclusion: The manufacturing techniques affected the mechanical behavior and the failure pattern of implant-supported crowns tested.
CITATION STYLE
Borges, S. M., Poole, S. F., Moris, F. I. C. M., Spazzin, A. O., Lapria Faria, A. C., & Gomes, E. A. (2019). Different fabrication techniques of implant-supported prostheses: Microhardness and fracture strength. Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, 18. https://doi.org/10.20396/BJOS.V18I0.8657254
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.