Measurement of left atrial volume in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation: Comparison of angiography and electro-anatomic (CARTO) mapping with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography

26Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: Left atrial (LA) volume can be determined during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) with angiography or electro-anatomic (CARTO) mapping. We compared these volumes with LA volume measured using transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE). Methods and results: One hundred and twenty-seven consecutive patients undergoing RFCA for AF were studied using biplane pulmonary vein angiography with opacification of the LA. LA volume was calculated from the diameter measurements with a formula using an ellipsoid model. A subset of 22 patients also underwent LA volume determination by CARTO mapping. These volumes were then correlated with LA volume determined non-invasively by real-time 3DE. Linear regression showed a significant correlation between LA volume determined by angiography and 3DE volume (r = 0.56, P < 0.0001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias of 38 ± 22 ml by the angiographic method. LA volume measured using CARTO correlated better (r = 0.67, P < 0.001), but 3DE yielded smaller values (mean difference of -30 ± 19 ml). Conclusion: LA volume determination by angiography and CARTO mapping correlate significantly with 3DE volume. However, both invasive techniques yield larger values for LA volume. The results indicate that LA volume obtained by angiography or CARTO should not be used as baseline value for non-invasive follow-up of LA remodelling by 3DE. © 2010 The Author.

References Powered by Scopus

STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT

42246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recommendations for chamber quantification: A report from the American Society of Echocardiography's guidelines and standards committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology

10026Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation - Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for practice guidelines (Writing committee to revise the 2001 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation)

1272Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS Expert Consensus Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Recommendations for Patient Selection, Procedural Techniques, Patient Management and Follow-up, Definitions, Endpoints, and Research Trial Design

1495Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

1362Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design

301Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Müller, H., Burri, H., Gentil, P., Lerch, R., & Shah, D. (2010). Measurement of left atrial volume in patients undergoing ablation for atrial fibrillation: Comparison of angiography and electro-anatomic (CARTO) mapping with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Europace, 12(6), 792–797. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euq031

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 6

46%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

23%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 12

86%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Sports and Recreations 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free