Management of tricuspid regurgitation: The role of transcatheter therapies

18Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Surgical treatment is the gold standard treatment of functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) but this carries high risks of morbidity and mortality. Percutaneous procedures are an attractive alternative to surgery for selected patients deemed to be high-risk surgical candidates. A number of tricuspid transcatheter devices have been developed to treat FTR, but at present, evidence of their efficacy and safety is scarce. Preliminary data have shown promising results, but ongoing and future studies will provide a clearer picture of the benefits of these new techniques.

References Powered by Scopus

Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease (version 2012)

3378Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease : A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines

1301Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Functional tricuspid regurgitation: A need to revise our understanding

285Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Tricuspid Regurgitation: Predicting the Need for Intervention, Procedural Success, and Recurrence of Disease

112Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The big parade: Emerging percutaneous mitral and tricuspid valve devices

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Early outcomes of transcatheter tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation: A case series

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taramasso, M., Calen, C., Guidotti, A., Kuwata, S., Biefer, H. R. C., Nietlispach, F., … Maisano, F. (2017). Management of tricuspid regurgitation: The role of transcatheter therapies. Interventional Cardiology: Reviews, Research, Resources, 12(1), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2017:3:2

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

58%

Researcher 3

25%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 12

75%

Engineering 3

19%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

6%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0