Kulturtheorie, systemtheorie und das sozialtheoretische muster der innen-außen-differenz

13Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In Niklas Luhmann's constructivistic systems theory, on the one hand, and in the cultural theories, above all of Pierre Bourdieu and Anthony Giddens, which follow the idea of social practices based on structures of tacit knowledge, on the other hand, the "interpreuve turn" in social theory has been taken in two theoretical frameworks which are opposed to each other. Following Descartes, Husserl, and Durkheim, Luhmann's chief distinction between psychic systems and social systems is based upon an "inside-outside distinction" between consciousness/mind and social world. Following Saussure and the later Wittgenstein, the cultural theories of Bourdieu and Giddens, however, situate themselves apart from the pattern of an inside-outside distinction and proceed from an analytical distinction between structures of knowledge and the praxis of action. When systems theory and cultural theories are interpreted along these lines, the tides of ordinary mutual criticism turn: The theories of culture turn out not to be "individualist," but to offer support for a social holism of rules. On the other hand, Luhmann's seeming holism turns out to possess an individualist converse in his concept of a psychic system and is confronted with the culture-theoretical critique of reducing social knowledge to semantics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reckwitz, A. (1997). Kulturtheorie, systemtheorie und das sozialtheoretische muster der innen-außen-differenz. Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie, 26(5), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfsoz-1997-0501

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free