Analisis Kinerja Kolom Pipih dan Kolom Konvensional pada Bangunan Bertingkat Rendah

  • Sakti T
  • Cornelis R
  • Karels D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Unconventional columns are very familiar in modern building construction because they impact the room's efficiency. Meanwhile, conventional columns affect the lack of efficiency in the room's functions. The performance analysis of the two types of columns used pushover analysis of the capacity spectrum method using ETABS v 16.1.0 software. The performance level results of the two types of columns in low-rise buildings are the same, which is Immediate Occupancy. The most significant maximum shearing force is at a low-rise building with an unconventional column with a maximum displacement on the east side of 160,00 mm. The smallest is a low-rise building with a conventional column in the east direction with maximum displacement on the Nort side of 90,11 mm. Thus, comparing the performance of the two types of columns can be concluded that conventional columns are stronger than unconventional columns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sakti, T. R., Cornelis, R., & Karels, D. W. (2022). Analisis Kinerja Kolom Pipih dan Kolom Konvensional pada Bangunan Bertingkat Rendah. JURNAL FORUM TEKNIK SIPIL (J-ForTekS), 2(1), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.35508/forteks.v2i1.6862

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free