The defence of conservation is not an attack on the poor

  • Sanderson S
  • Redford K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
171Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The relationship between poverty alleviation and biodiversity conservation continues to vex conservationists and social analysts alike. The three responses to our earlier Guest Editorial (Sanderson & Redford, 2003) help refine the arguments and shape the angles from which to approach the debate, but neither the editorial nor the responses satisfy entirely. What missing pieces must be found and fitted to the puzzle?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sanderson, S., & Redford, K. (2004). The defence of conservation is not an attack on the poor. Oryx, 38(2), 146–147. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605304000274

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free