Robotically assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Benefits to the patient and the cardiologist

16Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Robotic percutaneous interventional systems represent the future of interventional cardiology. Robotic technology significantly reduces operator exposure to ionizing radiation, and improves ergonomics in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, thereby preventing orthopedic injuries. It may enable more accurate stent implantation and reduce the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy. Robotics has the potential of converting the current high-risk catheterization laboratory into a safe, physician- and patient-friendly environment.

References Powered by Scopus

Nonoperative Dilatation of Coronary-Artery Stenosis: Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty

1993Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary interventions in relation to chronic kidney disease and hemodynamic variables

551Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Brain and neck tumors among physicians performing interventional procedures

460Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Haptic Telerobotic Cardiovascular Intervention: A Review of Approaches, Methods, and Future Perspectives

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Magnetostriction-based force feedback for robot-assisted cardiovascular surgery using smart magnetorheological elastomers

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toward Task Autonomy in Robotic Cardiac Ablation: Learning-Based Kinematic Control of Soft Tendon-Driven Catheters

37Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hasan, F., & Bonatti, J. (2015, November 2). Robotically assisted percutaneous coronary intervention: Benefits to the patient and the cardiologist. Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1586/14779072.2015.1091725

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2406121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

64%

Researcher 3

21%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

60%

Engineering 3

20%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

13%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0