Shallow and local or deep and regional? Inferring source groundwater characteristics across mainstem riverbank discharge faces

7Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Riverbank groundwater discharge faces are spatially extensive areas of preferential seepage that are exposed to air at low river flow. Some conceptual hydrologic models indicate discharge faces represent the spatial convergence of highly variable age and length groundwater flowpaths, while others indicate greater consistency in source groundwater characteristics. Our detailed field investigation of preferential discharge points nested across mainstem riverbank discharge faces was accomplished by: (1) leveraging new temperature-based recursive estimation (extended Kalman Filter) modelling methodology to evaluate seasonal, diurnal, and event-driven groundwater flux patterns, (2) developing a multi-parameter toolkit based on readily measured attributes to classify the general source groundwater flowpath depth and flowpath length scale, and, (3) assessing whether preferential flow points across discharge faces tend to represent common or convergent groundwater sources. Five major groundwater discharge faces were mapped along the Farmington River, CT, United States using thermal infrared imagery. We then installed vertical temperature profilers directly into 39 preferential discharge points for 4.5 months to track vertical discharge flux patterns. Monthly water chemistry was also collected at the discharge points along with one spatial synoptic of stable isotopes of water and dissolved radon gas. We found pervasive evidence of shallow groundwater sources at the upstream discharge faces along a wide valley section with deep bedrock, as primarily evidenced by pronounced diurnal discharge flux patterns. Discharge flux seasonal trends and bank storage transitions during large river flow events provided further indication of shallow, local sources. In contrast, downstream discharge faces associated with near surface cross cutting bedrock exhibited deep and regional source flowpath characteristics such as more stable discharge patterns and temperatures. However, many neighbouring points across discharge faces had similar discharge flux patterns that differed in chloride and radon concentrations, indicating the additional effects of localized flowpath heterogeneity overprinting on larger scale flowpath characteristics.

References Powered by Scopus

Global water resources and the role of groundwater in a resilient water future

460Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Heat as a tracer to determine streambed water exchanges

385Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Climate change impacts on groundwater and soil temperatures in cold and temperate regions: Implications, mathematical theory, and emerging simulation tools

244Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Where the past meets the present: connecting nitrogen from watersheds to streams through groundwater flowpaths

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

James Buttle Review: The Characteristics of Baseflow Resilience Across Diverse Ecohydrological Terrains

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Recent advances in vertical temperature profiler instrumentation and flux estimation methods facilitate groundwater – Surface water exchange studies in environments with strong discharge zones

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Haynes, A. B., Briggs, M. A., Moore, E., Jackson, K., Knighton, J., Rey, D. M., & Helton, A. M. (2023). Shallow and local or deep and regional? Inferring source groundwater characteristics across mainstem riverbank discharge faces. Hydrological Processes, 37(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14939

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 3

75%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Environmental Science 2

33%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

33%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

17%

Engineering 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free