Percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation - The evolution, current status and the future

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aortic valve stenosis (AS) will become more common as the population ages. Once symptoms occur, the prognosis is poor. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) has been the standard of care, improving symptoms and prolonging survival. A significant proportion of patients, however, do not undergo AVR due to increased surgicalrisk. The technology of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) emerged in 2002 and offered some of these patients an alternative therapy. A randomised (PARTNER) trial has shown that TAVI (using the Edwards-Sapien transcatheter heart valve) was superior to medical therapy (including balloon aortic valvuloplasty) in inoperable patients with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality at one year. For high surgical-risk patients, TAVI demonstrated non-inferiority to open AVR, with similar all-cause mortality at one year. Currently two devices, the Edwards-Sapien and the CoreValve transcatheter heart valves, are in clinical use and are undergoing further trials. Device improvements will be required to enhance procedural success and safety and longer term data would be required to understand the longevity of these valves. Further trial data would be required to compare TAVI and open AVR in moderate surgical-risk patients if this technology were to become a more common therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chiam, P. T. L., & Chao, V. T. T. (2013, June 1). Percutaneous transcatheter aortic valve implantation - The evolution, current status and the future. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare. SGH-PGMI Press. https://doi.org/10.1177/201010581302200211

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free