Evaluating the effects of socioeconomic status on stroke and bleeding risk scores and clinical events in patients on oral anticoagulant for new onset atrial fibrillation

10Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background The risk of thromboembolism and bleeding before initiation of oral anticoagulant (OAC) in atrial fibrillation patients is estimated by CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scoring system, respectively. Patients’ socioeconomic status (SES) could influence these risks, but its impact on the two risk scores’ predictive performance with respect to clinical events remains unknown. Our objective was to determine if patient SES defined by area deprivation index (ADI), in conjunction with CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, could guide oral anticoagulation therapy. Methods and findings The study cohort included newly diagnosed patients with AF who were treated with warfarin. The cohort was stratified by the time in therapeutic range of INR (TTR), ADI, CHA2DS2VASc, and HAS-BLED risk scores. TTR and ischemic and bleeding events during the first year of therapy were compared across subpopulations. Among 7274 patients, those living in the two most deprived quintiles (ADI =60%) had a significantly higher risk of ischemic events and those in the most deprived quintile (ADI=80%) had a significantly increased risk of bleeding events. ADI significantly improved the predictive performance of CHA2DS2VASc but not HAS-BLED risk scores. Conclusion ADI can predict increased risk for ischemic and bleeding events in the first year of warfarin therapy in patients with incident AF.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ravvaz, K., Weissert, J. A., Jahangir, A., & Ruff, C. T. (2021). Evaluating the effects of socioeconomic status on stroke and bleeding risk scores and clinical events in patients on oral anticoagulant for new onset atrial fibrillation. PLoS ONE, 16(3 March). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248134

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

70%

Researcher 3

30%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 9

69%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

15%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

8%

Materials Science 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0