We use an experiment built into a series of surveys of Iowa voters during the 2008 Iowa Caucus campaign to test the effect of differing group framing labels on immigration policy preferences. We find that certain framing labels matter, but only among Republican partisans for whom the immigration issue is important. We also find that issue importance produces more conservative policy preferences for Democrats as well as Republicans. We examine and discuss these results as well as their implications for the immigration debate, the interaction between issue salience and policy preferences, and the theory of political framing in general. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
CITATION STYLE
Knoll, B. R., Redlawsk, D. P., & Sanborn, H. (2011). Framing Labels and Immigration Policy Attitudes in the Iowa Caucuses: “Trying to Out-Tancredo Tancredo.” Political Behavior, 33(3), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9141-x
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.