A 14-mo zinc-supplementation trial in apparently healthy chilean preschool children

77Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Apparently healthy preschool children (46 boys, 52 girls) aged 27-50 mo from low socioeconomic conditions who attended daycare centers in Santiago participated in a 14-mo long double-blind zinc supplementation trial. Unlike most previous studies, no additional inclusion criteria such as short stature or slow growth rate were considered. Subjects were pair matched according to sex and age and randomly assigned to two experimental groups: the supplemented group, which received 10 mg Zn/d, and the placebo group. Selected anthropometric, clinical, dietary, biochemical, and functional indexes were determined at the beginning of the study and after 6 and 14 mo of intervention. Actual dietary zinc intake was 66% of the recommended dietary allowance. Height gain after 14 mo was on average 0.5 cm higher in the supplemented group (P = 0.10). The response, however, was different between sexes. Boys from the supplemented group gained 0.9 cm more than those in the placebo group (P = 0.045). No effect was seen in girls. Although no significant differences were observed in the rest of the variables studied, trends (0.05 < P < 0.10) in the supplemented group compared with the placebo group for increased midarm muscle area in boys, improved response to tuberculin, and reduced rates of parasite reinfestation were noted. We conclude that in preschool children of low socioeconomic status, zinc is a limiting factor in the expression of growth potential.

References Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ruz, M., Castillo-Duran, C., Lara, X., Codoceo, J., Rebolledo, A., & Alalah, E. (1997). A 14-mo zinc-supplementation trial in apparently healthy chilean preschool children. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 66(6), 1406–1413. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/66.6.1406

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

56%

Researcher 7

28%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 11

42%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

23%

Social Sciences 5

19%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4

15%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0