Hybrid Dependencies Between Cyber and Physical Systems

15Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Situational awareness is often a matter of detailed local information and proportionally limited view on the bigger picture. Conversely, the big picture avoids complicating details, and as such displays the system components as atomic “black boxes”. This work proposes a combination of local and global views, accounting for a common practical division of physical and cyber domains, each of which have their own group of experts and management processes. We identify a small set of data items that is required about the physical and cyber parts of a system, along with a high-level description of how these parts interoperate. From these three ingredients, which we call physical, cyber and hybrid “awareness” (meaning just knowledge about what is there), we construct a simulation model to study cascading effects and indirect implications of distortions in a cyber-physical system. Our simulation model is composed from coupled Mealy automata, and we show an instance of it using a small cyber-physical infrastructure. This extends the awareness from “knowing what is” to “knowing what could happen next”, and as such addresses a core duty of effective risk management. Manifold extensions to this model are imaginable and discussed in the aftermath of the definition and example demonstration.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

König, S., Rass, S., Rainer, B., & Schauer, S. (2019). Hybrid Dependencies Between Cyber and Physical Systems. In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 998, pp. 550–565). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22868-2_40

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free