Elastic, viscous, and mass load effects on poststroke muscle recruitment and co-contraction during reaching: A pilot study

24Citations
Citations of this article
120Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. Resistive exercise after stroke can improve strength (force-generating capacity) without increasing spasticity (velocity-dependent hypertonicity). However, the effect of resistive load type on muscle activation and co-contraction after stroke is not clear. Objective. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of load type (elastic, viscous, or mass) on muscle activation and co-contraction during resisted forward reaching in the paretic and nonparetic arms after stroke. Design. This investigation was a single-session, mixed repeated-measures pilot study. Methods. Twenty participants (10 with hemiplegia and 10 without neurologic involvement) reached forward with each arm against equivalent elastic, viscous, and mass loads. Normalized shoulder and elbow electromyography impulses were analyzed to determine agonist muscle recruitment and agonist-antagonist muscle co-contraction. Results. Muscle activation and co-contraction levels were significantly higher on virtually all outcome measures for the paretic and nonparetic arms of the participants with stroke than for the matched control participants. Only the nonparetic shoulder responded to load type with similar activation levels but variable co-contraction responses relative to those of the control shoulder. Elastic and viscous loads were associated with strong activation; mass and viscous loads were associated with minimal co-contraction. Limitations. A reasonable, but limited, range of loads was available. Conclusions. Motor control deficits were evident in both the paretic and the nonparetic arms after stroke when forward reaching was resisted with viscous, elastic, or mass loads. The paretic arm responded with higher muscle activation and co-contraction levels across all load conditions than the matched control arm. Smaller increases in muscle activation and co-contraction levels that varied with load type were observed in the nonparetic arm. On the basis of the response of the nonparetic arm, this study provides preliminary evidence suggesting that viscous loads elicited strong muscle activation with minimal co-contraction. Further intervention studies are needed to determine whether viscous loads are preferable for poststroke resistive exercise programs. © 2009 American Physical Therapy Association.

References Powered by Scopus

Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2007 Update: A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee

2738Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke

970Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: A randomised trial

796Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evidence for altered upper extremity muscle synergies in chronic stroke survivors with mild and moderate impairment

116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Force control deficits in chronic stroke: Grip formation and release phases

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A robotic test of proprioception within the hemiparetic arm post-stroke

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stoeckmann, T. M., Sullivan, K. J., & Scheidt, R. A. (2009). Elastic, viscous, and mass load effects on poststroke muscle recruitment and co-contraction during reaching: A pilot study. Physical Therapy, 89(7), 665–678. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20080128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 49

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 10

14%

Researcher 8

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 26

41%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 14

22%

Nursing and Health Professions 13

20%

Engineering 11

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free