The "Plague of Cyprian": A revised view of the origin and spread of a 3rd-c. CE pandemic

21Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Kyle Harper's article on the Plague of Cyprian that appeared in this journal in 2015 constitutes the only comprehensive study to date of this important disease outbreak in the third quarter of the 3rd c. CE. The current article revisits the main evidence for this epidemic and corrects and improves our understanding of its origin, timeline, and spread. It contends that the disease entered the Roman Empire via Gothic invasions on the Danube rather than traveling up the Nile from inner Africa. It further argues that the disease reached the Roman Empire only after the death of Decius and cannot be connected with the latter's edict commanding sacrifices to the Roman gods, issued in 249 CE. While the pestilence indubitably exacerbated the political and military crisis of the third quarter of the 3rd c. CE, it should probably not be considered as the root of the crisis itself, as Harper has suggested.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huebner, S. R. (2021, June 1). The “Plague of Cyprian”: A revised view of the origin and spread of a 3rd-c. CE pandemic. Journal of Roman Archaeology. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047759421000349

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free