Comparative studies of different vascular stents in terms of mechanical performances: Finite element analysis

3Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Seven representative commercialized stents were evaluated by FE analysis in terms of the criteria based on the itemized list of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Standards (prEN). Tenax and MAC standard were generally excellent in various evaluation items. Palmaz-Schatz was the most excellent in fatigue durability, but its flexibility was a little inferior than that of other stents. This study may suggest a guideline for improvement in stent design and function. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cho, S. K., Park, W. P., Cho, E. J., Lim, D., Kim, H. S., & Ko, J. Y. (2008). Comparative studies of different vascular stents in terms of mechanical performances: Finite element analysis. In IFMBE Proceedings (Vol. 18, pp. 744–747). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74471-9_173

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free