Genome-wide association study for genotype by lactation stage interaction of milk production traits in dairy cattle

12Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Substantial evidence demonstrates that the genetic background of milk production traits changes during lactation. However, most GWAS for milk production traits assume that genetic effects are constant during lactation and therefore might miss those quantitative trait loci (QTL) whose effects change during lactation. The GWAS for genotype by lactation stage interaction are aimed at explicitly detecting the QTL whose effects change during lactation. The purpose of this study was to perform GWAS for genotype by lactation stage interaction for milk yield, lactose yield, lactose content, fat yield, fat content, protein yield, and somatic cell score to detect QTL with changing effects during lactation. For this study, 19,286 test-day records of 1,800 first-parity Dutch Holstein cows were available and cows were genotyped using a 50K SNP panel. A total of 7 genomic regions with effects that change during lactation were detected in the GWAS for genotype by lactation stage interaction. Two regions on Bos taurus autosome (BTA)14 and BTA19 were also significant based on a GWAS that assumed constant genetic effects during lactation. Five regions on BTA4, BTA10, BTA11, BTA16, and BTA23 were only significant in the GWAS for genotype by lactation stage interaction. The biological mechanisms that cause these changes in genetic effects are still unknown, but negative energy balance and effects of pregnancy may play a role. These findings increase our understanding of the genetic background of lactation and may contribute to the development of better management indicators based on milk composition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lu, H., Wang, Y., & Bovenhuis, H. (2020). Genome-wide association study for genotype by lactation stage interaction of milk production traits in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(6), 5234–5245. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17257

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free