Different Strokes and Different Folks

  • Terblanché-Greeff A
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In cross-cultural studies, cultures are often described based on their cultural values. Examples of such values are time orientation and social self-construal. Cultures might predominantly represent one of these seemingly bipolar categories, and often dualistic categories of time orientation and social self-construal are grouped, namely monochronism and individualism ( MONO + INDV ), as well as polychronism and collectivism ( POLY + COLL ). In academic literature, limited focus is allocated to unique cultural value variations or orthogonal groupings (e.g., MONO + COLL ) – a clear gap in the knowledge base. In this article, through conceptual analysis, the author expounds some differences between three POLY + COLL cultures (found in South Africa, the Arab League, and China) based on their time orientation and social self-construal. She also gives accounts of the Japanese and French cultures that present with orthogonal groupings ( MONO + COLL and POLY + INDV , respectively) to illustrate that such groupings – much like unique cultural value variants – should receive more focused attention in cross-cultural research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Terblanché-Greeff, A. C. (2023). Different Strokes and Different Folks. Comparative Sociology, 22(1), 138–165. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-bja10075

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free