Autonomous guidewire navigation in a two dimensional vascular phantom

36Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The treatment of cerebro- and cardiovascular diseases requires complex and challenging navigation of a catheter. Previous attempts to automate catheter navigation lack the ability to be generalizable. Methods of Deep Reinforcement Learning show promising results and may be the key to automate catheter navigation through the tortuous vascular tree. This work investigates Deep Reinforcement Learning for guidewire manipulation in a complex and rigid vascular model in 2D. The neural network trained by Deep Deterministic Policy Gradients with Hindsight Experience Replay performs well on the low-level control task, however the high-level control of the path planning must be improved further.

References Powered by Scopus

Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning

23131Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SOFA: A Multi-Model Framework for Interactive Physical Simulation

333Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

New approaches to catheter navigation for interventional radiology simulation

98Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Medical microrobots in reproductive medicine from the bench to the clinic

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Guidewire Navigation in Coronary Artery Phantom

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning-based autonomous vascular guidewire navigation without human demonstration in the venous system of a porcine liver

26Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karstensen, L., Behr, T., Pusch, T. P., Mathis-Ullrich, F., & Stallkamp, J. (2020). Autonomous guidewire navigation in a two dimensional vascular phantom. In Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering (Vol. 6). Walter de Gruyter GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2020-0007

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 11

61%

Researcher 4

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 10

63%

Computer Science 3

19%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

13%

Materials Science 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free