The Ethics of Overlapping Relationships in Rural and Remote Healthcare. A Narrative Review

5Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

It is presently unclear whether a distinct “rural ethics” of navigating professional boundaries exists, and if so, what theoretical approaches may assist practitioners to manage overlapping relationships. To be effective clinicians while concurrently partaking in community life, practitioners must develop and maintain safe, ethical, and sustainable therapeutic relationships in rural and remote healthcare. A narrative review was conducted identifying a significant body of qualitative and theoretical literature which explores the pervasiveness of dual relationships for practitioners working in rural and remote healthcare. Rather than viewing dual relationships as ethically unacceptable, much contemporary work focusses on the lived experiences of healthcare workers and explores what approaches may be available that both protect the therapeutic relationship while recognizing the unique nature of rural and remote healthcare practice. We conclude that practitioners must have a means of operating within a contextually informed ethics of professional boundaries. Drawing on pre-existing work, one schema is proposed that could form the basis for further engagement through interactive teaching sessions, professional development, mentoring, or guidelines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Szumer, R. T. O., & Arnold, M. (2023). The Ethics of Overlapping Relationships in Rural and Remote Healthcare. A Narrative Review. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 20(2), 181–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10243-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free