Conventional versus reference-surface mass balance

60Citations
Citations of this article
122Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Glacier surface mass balance evaluated over the actual glacier geometry depends not only on climatic variations, but also on the dynamic adjustment of glacier geometry. Therefore, it has been proposed that reference-surface balances calculated over a constant glacier hypsometry are better suited for climatic interpretation. Here we present a comparison of 82 year modelled time series (1926- 2008) of conventional and reference-surface balance for 36 Swiss glaciers. Over this time period the investigated glaciers have lost 22% of their area, and ice surface elevation close to the current glacier terminus has decreased by 78m on average. Conventional balance in the last decade, at -0.91mw.e. a -1, is 0.14mw.e. a -1 less negative than the reference-surface balance. About half of the negative (stabilizing) feedback on mass balance due to glacier terminus retreat is compensated by more negative mass balances due to surface lowering. Short-term climatic variability is clearly reflected in the conventional mass-balance series; however, the magnitude of the long-term negative trend is underestimated compared to that found in the reference-surface balance series. Both conventional and reference-surface specific balances show large spatial variability among the 36 glaciers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huss, M., Hock, R., Bauder, A., & Funk, M. (2012). Conventional versus reference-surface mass balance. Journal of Glaciology, 58(208), 278–286. https://doi.org/10.3189/2012JoG11J216

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free