Reaffirming the predicator and verbal group in systemic grammar: A reply to Fawcett's "In place of Halliday's 'verbal group'"

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In early (Scale and Category) expositions of Systemic Grammar, the verbal group realised the Predicator. Halliday now appears to recognise the Finite as a separate element from the Predicator in clause structure, thereby having more than one clause element realised by different constituents of the same verbal group. Fawcett dispenses with the Predicator and the verbal group entirely and analyses the various verbal constituents as separate clause elements. In direct contrast to Fawcett's article "In place of Halliday's 'verbal group'", this paper argues in favour of retaining the Predicator and the verbal group, and of handling the finite element not as an element of clause structure but rather as a feature which is conflated with a constituent element of the verbal group.

References Powered by Scopus

In place of Halliday's 'verbal group' Part 2: Evidence from generation, semantics, and interruptability

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The verbal group

12Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morley, G. D. (2001). Reaffirming the predicator and verbal group in systemic grammar: A reply to Fawcett’s “In place of Halliday’s ‘verbal group.’” Word, 52(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2001.11432517

Readers over time

‘11‘16‘17‘2400.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

33%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

33%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 2

67%

Arts and Humanities 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0