Isotropic hyperelasticity in principal stretches: explicit elasticity tensors and numerical implementation

24Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Elasticity tensors for isotropic hyperelasticity in principal stretches are formulated and implemented for the Finite Element Method. Hyperelastic constitutive models defined by this strain measure are known to accurately model the response of rubber, and similar materials. These models may not be available in the library of a Finite Element Analysis software, but a numerical implementation of the constitutive model may be provided by a programmed subroutine. The implementation proposed here is robust and accurate, with straightforward user input. It is presented in multiple configurations with novel features, including efficient definition of isochoric stress and elasticity coefficients, symmetric dyadic products of the principal directions, and development of a stable and accurate algorithm for equal and similar principal stretches. The proposed implementation is validated, for unique, equal and similar principal stretches. Further validation in the Finite Element Method demonstrates the developed implementation requires lower computational effort compared with an alternative, well-known implementation.

References Powered by Scopus

2896Citations
1112Readers
Get full text

A new constitutive relation for rubber

1546Citations
357Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Connolly, S. J., Mackenzie, D., & Gorash, Y. (2019). Isotropic hyperelasticity in principal stretches: explicit elasticity tensors and numerical implementation. Computational Mechanics, 64(5), 1273–1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-019-01707-1

Readers over time

‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

59%

Researcher 7

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 22

76%

Materials Science 4

14%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 2

7%

Computer Science 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0