Post-Truth, Postmodernism and the Public Sphere

  • Newman S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This chapter explores the epistemic and political challenge of post-truth discourse to the idea of the liberal democratic public sphere—a challenge that has been intensified in the time of right-wing populism and COVID-19. However, I also take this as an opportunity to rethink the notion of the public sphere, pointing to the way that emancipatory social movements disrupt the institutions of the liberal democratic state through their claims for social and environmental justice. In this context, I examine the controversy around the relationship between post-truth and ‘postmodernism’, arguing that, so far from being hostile to truth, poststructuralist theory may serve as an antidote to post-truth. Here I focus on Foucault’s idea of parrhesia as an agonistic way of speaking truth to power that at the same reinvigorates the democratic space.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Newman, S. (2023). Post-Truth, Postmodernism and the Public Sphere (pp. 13–30). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13694-8_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free