Comparison of the pericapsular nerve group block with the intra-articular and quadratus lumborum blocks in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial

11Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block, quadratus lumborum block (QLB), and intra-articular (IA) local anesthetic injection have been shown to provide effective analgesia in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This randomized study aimed to com-pare the analgesic efficacy, motor protection, and quality of recovery associated with the PENG block, QLB, and IA injection. Methods: Eighty-nine patients who underwent a unilateral primary THA under spinal anesthesia were randomly assigned to the PENG (n = 30), QLB (n = 30), or IA (n = 29) group. The primary outcome was the numerical rating scale (NRS) score over the first 48 h postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were postoperative opioid consumption, quadriceps and adductor muscle strength, and quality of recovery (QoR-40). Results: The dynamic (with movement) NRS scores at 3 and 6 h postoperatively were sig-nificantly lower in the PENG and QLB groups compared to the IA group (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). The time to first opioid analgesia requirement was longer in the PENG and QLB groups than in the IA group (P = 0.009 and P = 0.016, respectively). A provided better preservation was found in the the PENG group than in the QLB group in terms of quadriceps muscle strength at 3 h postoperatively (P = 0.007) and time to mobilization (P = 0.003). No significant differences in the QoR-40 scores were seen. Conclusions: The PENG and QLB groups showed similar analgesic effects and both showed more effective analgesia 6 h postoperatively than the IA group. All the groups showed similar postoperative quality of recovery.

References Powered by Scopus

Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Fracture

364Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Postoperative Pain after Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

274Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block and quadriceps strength: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy volunteers

263Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Pain Management and Functional Recovery after Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Clinical Trial

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ultrasound-guided caudal quadratus lumborum block combined with the greater ischiatic notch plane block as motor-protective analgesia for the pelvic limb in dogs

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficacy and safety of pericapsular nerve group block in total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Et, T., & Korkusuz, M. (2023). Comparison of the pericapsular nerve group block with the intra-articular and quadratus lumborum blocks in primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 76(6), 575–585. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.23064

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

63%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

19%

Researcher 2

13%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 14

64%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

18%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

14%

Social Sciences 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0