Real-world examples of sensitivity failures of the 3%/3mm pass rate metric and published action levels when used in IMRT/VMAT system commissioning

13Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In IMRT/VMAT system commissioning (as with any system), quality is improved by striving for tight tolerances of stringent metrics of accuracy. For 5 cases, passing rates for 3%/3mm gamma analysis were generated following the TG119 instructions. Subsequently, more stringent/sensitive criteria combined with advanced volumetric dose analysis were applied, and in each case significant systematic errors were clearly identified despite the high 3%/3mm passing rates. In 4 of 5 cases, the error was easily remedied. These real-world examples of observed "false negatives" (insensitivities) point towards the inappropriateness of the 3%/3mm gamma passing rate metric as the basis for acceptance testing/commissioning of the IMRT/VMAT delivery chain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nelms, B., Jarry, G., Chan, M., Hampton, C., Watanabe, Y., & Feygelman, V. (2013). Real-world examples of sensitivity failures of the 3%/3mm pass rate metric and published action levels when used in IMRT/VMAT system commissioning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 444). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/444/1/012086

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free