International standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine in Europe

43Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To develop internationally harmonised standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine (ICM). Methods: Standards were developed by using consensus techniques. A nine-member nominal group of European intensive care experts developed a preliminary set of standards. These were revised and refined through a modified Delphi process involving 28 European national coordinators representing national training organisations using a combination of moderated discussion meetings, email, and a Web-based tool for determining the level of agreement with each proposed standard, and whether the standard could be achieved in the respondent's country. Results: The nominal group developed an initial set of 52 possible standards which underwent four iterations to achieve maximal consensus. All national coordinators approved a final set of 29 standards in four domains: training centres, training programmes, selection of trainees, and trainers' profiles. Only three standards were considered immediately achievable by all countries, demonstrating a willingness to aspire to quality rather than merely setting a minimum level. Nine proposed standards which did not achieve full consensus were identified as potential candidates for future review. Conclusions: This preliminary set of clearly defined and agreed standards provides a transparent framework for assuring the quality of training programmes, and a foundation for international harmonisation and quality improvement of training in ICM. © 2010 Copyright jointly held by Springer and ESICM.

References Powered by Scopus

Qualitative Research: Consensus methods for medical and health services research

2750Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Flexner Report and the Standardization of American Medical Education

215Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: A review of the literature

165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research<sup>*</sup>

319Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2011. II. Cardiovascular, infections, pneumonia and sepsis, critical care organization and outcome, education, ultrasonography, metabolism and coagulation

38Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Intensive care unit specialist: Report from the Task Force of World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bion, J. F., Wilde, J. D., & Bullock, A. (2011). International standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine in Europe. Intensive Care Medicine, 37(3), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-010-2096-x

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

43%

Professor / Associate Prof. 9

32%

Researcher 4

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 25

86%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

7%

Neuroscience 1

3%

Engineering 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free