Comparing grazing and resting electivity of beef cattle for BC bunchgrass communities using GPS collars

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Grasslands in the interior of British Columbia often contain a mosaic of plant communities that provide variable habitat for free-ranging cattle. Global positioning system (GPS) collars have been used to study natural habitat use by cattle on a coarse scale (such as riparian, grassland and forested habitats), but not on a fine scale (such as choice among grassland plant communities). Cows equipped with GPS collars were tracked during the spring grazing period for 4 yr. Six grassland pastures were used as replicates. The activity (grazing or resting) of cattle at GPS locations was classified using a distance travelled algorithm. A detailed plant community map of five plant community types was constructed, and cow relative use within the plant communities was determined. Electivity, which scales for differences in community area, was used to compare the use of plant communities. While grazing, electivity for the Kentucky bluegrass community (mean +0.3) was greater than for the bluebunch wheatgrass community (mean -0.2). While resting, these differences were more pronounced. GPS collars can be used to estimate fine-scale choices among grassland communities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thompson, D. J., Wheatley, B. J., Church, J. S., Newman, R., & Walker, J. (2015). Comparing grazing and resting electivity of beef cattle for BC bunchgrass communities using GPS collars. Canadian Journal of Animal Science, 95(4), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.4141/CJAS-2014-116

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free