User embedding for scholarly microblog recommendation

37Citations
Citations of this article
116Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Nowadays, many scholarly messages are posted on Chinese microblogs and more and more researchers tend to find scholarly information on microblogs. In order to exploit microblogging to benefit scientific research, we propose a scholarly microblog recommendation system in this study. It automatically collects and mines scholarly information from Chinese microblogs, and makes personalized recommendations to researchers. We propose two different neural network models which learn the vector representations for both users and microblog texts. Then the recommendation is accomplished based on the similarity between a user's vector and a microblog text's vector. We also build a dataset for this task. The two embedding models are evaluated on the dataset and show good results compared to several baselines.

References Powered by Scopus

Recommender systems with social regularization

1373Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Collaborative personalized tweet recommendation

255Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamic user modeling in social media systems

142Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Multi-interest network with dynamic routing for recommendation at Tmall

295Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

#suicidal - A multipronged approach to identify and explore suicidal ideation in twitter

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

User community detection via embedding of social network structure and temporal content

44Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yu, Y., Wan, X., & Zhou, X. (2016). User embedding for scholarly microblog recommendation. In 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2016 - Short Papers (pp. 449–453). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/p16-2073

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 45

75%

Researcher 11

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

3%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 60

85%

Engineering 5

7%

Linguistics 5

7%

Neuroscience 1

1%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0